@oliver75montes
We understand that and that’s why @sam_mccarthy is leading a governance redesign process to address all the issues with governance.
So I hope you watched the previous session (link in Sam’s update post) we had and please join the upcoming co-gov meetings where you can influence how the new governance system would look like.
see schedule and meetings here:
We have to understand that most people won’t have any incentive to participate in high level governance. That’s why we are thinking how to create different tiers of participation.
For example experimenting with Gardens pools - Fund pools by the DAO or Foundation and allow any G$ holders to vote on proposals. Gardens allow different voting systems to control the pool such as quadratic voting or 1 token 1 vote or fixed voting power per person. See our first experiment with the builders and data team pools.
We have also ran the builders program using flowstate where a mix of community votes, moderators and objective metrics decided how the funds are distributed to projects. The round was done using X votes per unique user but flowstate also supporting quadratic voting. And we incentivized voting using SUP rewards we have from the superfluid campaign.
So we are thinking how to make everything more inclusive, but also we have to be realistic about participation.